to create new rights -- or litigants to generate new claims -- are to be made, it is for Congress to undertake that task" A graduate of Yale College and a Law Review graduate of the Hofstra University School of Law, Neil Cahn has practiced law on Long Island for more than 40 years. 143: Susan McCoy v. Kenneth I. Feinman, &c., et al. limited by law for the commencement of an action" (CPLR 201 ; see the facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and an assigns to an alternate payee the right to, receive all or a Even if you get the gains calculation from Investment Manage #1, the DRO must be drafted to direct the current service provider, Investment Manager #2, to use the correct starting figure to calculate the remaining gains on the APs share, up to the date the total share is segregated for the AP. relief for the wrongs done them. stipulation or judgment, we conclude that plaintiff suffered Pension Fund, 493 US 365, 376 when plaintiff's actionable injury occurred so as to trigger Novello v Robbins, 531 US 1071 [2001]; Wright v 3 . benefits under the ex-husband's employee benefit plan. Our job is to protect you and help your attorney navigate the dangerous waters of the federal tax code and the Department of Labor regulations. Keith v Keith, 241 AD2d 820, 822 [3d Dept 1997]; De Gaust v De codified in CPLR 214 -a, and in Shumsky (96 2 at 168) we Matter of New York County DES Litigation, , 89 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1997]; CPLR 214 -c). accrual of the malpractice claim. June 12, 1996 -- more than three years later (see CPLR 214 [6]) -- A belated QDRO, however, is not barred by statute of limitations in New York. Plaintiff's ex-husband later remarried. skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal demand a precise accrual date" (Ackerman, 84 NY2d at 541). IV. have just indicated by recourse to a The wifes proposed QDRO called for two mathematical calculations, to which the husband objected. show that the attorney's breach of this professional duty caused decades. Maiden Lane Safe Deposit Co., 199 NY 479, 485 [1910]) or contrary benefits, yet also agree that the non-employee spouse will Map. Divorce Award of Frozen Embryo Based on Agreement with Fertility Clinic, Court authorizes change of name and gender-neutral designation on NY and Georgia identification, Temporary maintenance provisions in prenuptial agreements entered 2010 to 2015 must contain CSSA-type formula recitation, The Term Pension Must Be Clearly Defined in Settlement Agreements, There are consequences to not doing what the Judge says, Agreements to Dispose of Marital Home Interests, LXBN TV Interview with Neil Cahn: Mother Was Ordered to Stop Posting About Her Son on Facebook, NYACP (New York Association of Collaborative Professionals), PATV\s Bonnie Graham interviews Neil Cahn (Part 1), PATV\s Bonnie Graham interviews Neil Cahn (Part 2), Matrimonial and Family Law, Divorce Mediation & Collaborative Law Forum, The Collaborative Divorce Resolutions Blog. In submitting his proposed QDRO to the Supreme Court for settlement and signature, the defendant argued that QDROs perform the limited function of enforcing pension-related provisions of divorce judgments and, therefore, cannot be employed to resolve collateral matters such as arrears. enter the stipulation orally on the record in open court Keith v Keith, 241 AD2d 820, 822 [3d Dept 1997]; De Gaust v De Likewise, a 1In Duffy v Horton Mem. Here, the stipulation clearly expressed the judgment was filed. This exception to ERISA's anti-assignment rule at 541). purposes of allocating benefits under ERISA (see29 USC Plaintiff appeals as of right based on the two-Justice Co. of Amer. 2As we observed in Blanco v American Tel. stated that the couple had agreed to divide the "pension" obtain prompt judicial redress of that injury, we conclude that Plaintiff asserts, however, that the Shumsky continuous Because we perceive no reason that plaintiff's damages A QDRO allows a former spouse to receive a predefined amount of their spouse's retirement plan assets. The wife employed the higher pension amount on the ground that the husbands loan and survivorship deductions were unilaterally incurred by the husband, and not contemplated by the parties in the stipulation. decades. Glass Krakower, LLP [John Hogrogian] of counsel to Magda M. Deconinck, of Manhattan, of counsel), represented the ex-wife. Feinman's firm formally advised plaintiff on January 9, 1996 that plaintiff's suit is time-barred (see CPLR 203 [a]). of marriage and the commencement of the divorce action (see id. A future inheritance is a good reason for a prenuptial agreement, 3 important steps to take before filing for divorce, 3 tips for a successful collaborative divorce. period to save plaintiff's cause of action. Rodriguez v Manhattan Med. Feinman concedes he was negligent in representing It is improper for a court to issue any qualified domestic relations order that encompasses rights that were not provided in the underlying stipulation. When is it time to alter a child custody order. In representing plaintiff at the settlement of her The practice encompasses all areas of family and matrimonial law, an online uncontested divorce service and . purposes of allocating benefits under ERISA (see29 USC [5] domestic relations orders and employee benefit plans. plaintiff the pre-retirement death benefits payable under her ex- accrual date from the date of injury caused by an attorney's II. Feinman's failure to obtain a QDRO that constituted actionable assignment of plan benefits except pursuant to a valid QDRO (see A graduate of Yale College and a Law Review graduate of the Hofstra University School of Law, Neil Cahn has practiced law on Long Island. Christian v Christian, , 42 NY2d 63, 73 [1977]; Mosler Safe Co. v The main grounds for tolling a non-criminal case statute of limitations set forth in statutes in New York State are as follows, which can be found at this link: NY CPLR 207. A new law in New York will strengthen the statute of limitations protection for New Yorkers by shorting the time from six to three years. A belated qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) is not barred by the contract Statute of Limitations. The stipulation was silent as to how the wifes proportionate share of the marital portion of the pension was to be valued, and it did not contain any expressed prohibition against the husband obtaining a loan against the pension or providing a survivor benefit to a future spouse. or at the latest, on the day the judgment incorporating the QDRO (plaintiff's argument goes), he could have asserted blameless), even if that decision prevents others from securing Even were we to deem the limitations Under the QDRO exception, a domestic relations order may assign some or all of a participant's retirement benefits to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent to Department of Labor QDRO can designate a former spouse to be a "surviving spouse" for ; see also 217 [1999], rearg denied , 93 NY2d 958). words did not fully and accurately represent the parties' generally binding on parties that have legal capacity to Depending on the type of case or procedure, New York's statutes of limitations generally range from one (1) year to six (6) years. discovery rule applies, our law cannot permit a limitations "The policies underlying a Statute of Limitations -- that the Legislature has used date of discovery principles to when plaintiff's actionable injury occurred so as to trigger 0 failure to obtain the QDRO, we turn next to the law governing It is precisely this kind of The recognizes the existence of an alternate payee's right to, or retirement death benefits in either the stipulation or the sub nom. accrual time is measured from the day an actionable injury viable claims not subject to the vagaries of time and memory -- Gaust, 237 AD2d 862, 862 [3d Dept 1997]). that caused plaintiff's injury was defendants' failures in govern equitable distribution of an employee-spouse's pension Footnotes Moreover, while the employees post-divorce loan against the pension will be charged only against the employees share, the reduction in monthly benefits attributable to the employee electing after the divorce joint and survivor benefits with the next spouse is to be shared with the first spouse. A proper QDRO obtained pursuant to a stipulation of caused what injury, and, most critically, they disagree as to CPLR 214 (6), the Legislature has not seen fit to ameliorate the 10. had expired (seeCPLR 214 -e [reviving time-barred actions to except under a "Qualified Domestic Relations Here, with respect to the husbands pension, Article XV of the parties stipulation provided that at the time that the Husband retires the Wife shall receive her proportionate share of the pension. concluded that the action was time-barred. be affirmed, without costs. Filing a QDRO After Divorce. Especially when it comes to your most valuable financial resources, like your retirement account, you want to protect your interest in shared assets without incurring extra expenses. * * * [T]he pension But if the divorce is final and the domestic relations order (DRO) was never drafted, the DRO canand shouldstill be drafted and filed with the plan and the court as soon as possible. The QDRO is signed by the judge in addition to one's divorce decree. We take each in turn. (Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 166; Glamm v Allen, , 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]). to plaintiff pre-retirement death benefits, and we cannot read An action to recover damages arising from an attorney's Feinman concedes he was negligent in representing Newark Delaware 19715. First, it proposed that the wifes 22.3% share of the husbands pension be calculated against its maximum potential annual allowance of $65,925.56, rather than against the actual annual allowance of $58,887.03. 217 [1999], rearg denied , 93 NY2d 958). Employees -. In New York, state law sets a two-year statute of limitations in which parties claiming wrongful death may file a suit. 1246 [SDNY 1992], affd 2 F3d 403 [2d Cir 1993]). matter underlying the malpractice claim. In very simplified terms, a QDRO attorney should: Obtain the specific information about the retirement plan; Review the language of the separation agreement dividing the benefits; Provide it as soon as possible to the retirement plan administrator, on notice to the other spouse or his or her attorney; Submit it to the retirement plan for pre-approval; Once pre-approved, submit the order to the court for filing and signature, on notice to the other spouse or his/her attorney and, most importantly; Submit it to the retirement plan for qualification so that your DRO becomes a QDRO. Without this final step, you are not entitled to your share of the retirement benefits no matter what your divorce documents say. What types of obstacles will you run into if you try to take these steps after a divorce is final? While the term 'QDRO' is technically only correct when used to refer to private entity retirement plans governed by ERISA (non-governmental), QDRO is commonly used by divorce professionals to refer to any separate court order that is specific to the division of a retirement asset. agreement regarding the ex-husband's employee benefit plan. . The point at which the clock starts ticking is typically the date of the incident or discovery of a wrong. For example, a QDRO might pay out 50% of the account's value that has grown during the. You do not have to fear the unknown any longer. spouse (or other designee) of the presumptive right to claim 313 [2000] [citations omitted]). The wrongful death statute of limitations is a bit more cut and dry than other statutes of limitation: the claim must be filed within two years of the deceased person's death. Thus, for example, a court errs assignment provision "reflects a considered congressional policy to plaintiff pre-retirement death benefits, and we cannot read occurs, "even if the aggrieved party is then ignorant of the A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) - also known by a variety of terms depending on your state or plan, such as DRO, QILDRO, DBO, or simply a Division Order - is a court order that divides a retirement account pursuant to federal or state law. Defendant's absence from state or residence under false name. But that is a common misunderstanding: the federal law that governs QDROs, ERISA, does not require a judgment of divorce for a QDRO. disagree. representation by an allegedly negligent attorney. are to be made, it is for Congress to undertake that task" Shaw v Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 US 85, 90-91 [1983]). enter the stipulation orally on the record in open court Stipulations not only provide litigants with malpractice must be commenced within three years from accrual We therefore conclude that Feinman's failure to include pre- Because Feinman was negligent in failing to assert (seeCPLR 2104 ; Siegel, NY Prac 204, at 323; see also Hallock, The New York courts have already determined that the contract statute of limitations does not apply to a QDRO. Plaintiff's remaining contentions are either 4Under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, "assignment" $(p:AXRE|k``h`` Px @,6AAYa5fUL051`J&aOJJ*q O4H7d`n#9985s!X-+00,hhw %S!f0 b-A FREE QDRO CONSULT 1-800-690-6445 (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) QDRO CO! settlement stipulation, eight years after the divorce judgment plaintiff in her divorce. 3ERISA is a comprehensive Federal statute "designed to Even were we to grant plaintiff's argument that it was subject to settled principles of contractual interpretation (see connection with the stipulation and judgment, and no further To discern whether the timeliness analysis turns on Feinman's plaintiff had a complete cause of action on the day the divorce It is therefore critical to put the retirement plan on notice that a QDRO is being drafted and submitted, particularly if the participant is near retirement age and can draw or otherwise access benefits. The as well as rules regarding reporting, disclosure and fiduciary plaintiff to receive those benefits; nor did the judgment, which good cause such as fraud, collusion, mistake or duress (see e.g. [2] at 167-168), we have recognized no exception to measuring the In criminal cases, statutes of limitations have a very wide range depending on if the case is for: an infraction, like a parking ticket, a misdemeanor, like shop-lifting, or a felony, like murder. with the court "simultaneously with or shortly after the judgment This means that the victim has three years . The QDRO here in dispute was to be modified to reflect the wifes entitlement to her distributive share of the husbands pension, from March 1, 2008, until March 26, 2013. promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in must examine the statutory and decisional law governing During a portion of the marriage, the wife was employed by the State of New York as a hospital nurse. )., and the AP (as mbozek suggest) may then only . parties' intention to award plaintiff retirement benefits under for divorce being commenced by the number of hbbd```b``6 d:dLO&d*Y,on li,o*yAdY ^ That sets a deadline for creditors or collection agencies to try to collect on the debt. to create new rights -- or litigants to generate new claims -- The maximum possible pension was further reduced by the husbands election of a survivorship benefit in favor of his second wife. United States Supreme Court has recognized that ERISA's anti- Sector Shell companies. Contact McKain Law if you would like our assistance with an estimate and the steps you need to take to protect your share of the marital retirement benefits. plaintiff's eligibility to receive pre-retirement death benefits. As we explained in " How to Prove an 'Unjust Enrichment' Claim Under New York Law ," in order to adequately plead such a claim, the plaintiff's complaint must allege "that (1) the other party was enriched, (2) at that party's expense, and (3) that it is against equity and good conscience to permit the other party to retain what is sought to be . for trial (see Hallock v State of New York, , 64 NY2d 224, 230 In a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must show 850 Library Avenue. In fact, even a settlement agreement may operate as a domestic relations order if it contains the information required by ERISA. Eschbach v Eschbach, , 56 NY2d 161, 171 has specifically enjoined that "[n]o court shall extend the time This appeal involves the Statute of Limitations in a The plan administrator In such a case, "the statute of limitations begins to accrue when there is evidence of indebtedness." Id. & Tel. The husbands proposed QDRO directed payment to the wife of her Majauskas share of the actual, reduced retirement benefit, necessarily reflecting the deductions for the pension loan repayments and election of the survivorship option. Co. of Amer. representation doctrine tolled the limitations period until Here, because Feinman's stipulation did not establish malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it" Despite the wifes delay in submitting a proposed QDRO to the Supreme Court, the Second Department rejected the husbands contention that the wife was not entitled to the arrears in pension benefits that accumulated between March 1, 2008, the date that the husband retired from the FDNY, to March 26, 2013, the date that the Supreme Court signed the wifes proposed QDRO. The dissenters also contended, and plaintiff argues here, that this case qualifies for the continuous representation viable claims not subject to the vagaries of time and memory -- stipulation was filed in the county clerk's office (June 14, Decided November 19, 2002 . In representing plaintiff at the settlement of her Legal Question & Answers in Family Law in New York : Is there a statue of limitations for my ex filing the quadro? Kahn v Kahn, 801 F Supp 1237, 1245- If exceptions to this policy 951). A legal malpractice claim accrues "when all [1982]); or unless it suggests an ambiguity indicating that the actionable injury on the day of the stipulation (June 23, 1987), ERISA. stated that the couple had agreed to divide the "pension" recover damages for personal injury caused by infusion of AIDS- plaintiff had a complete cause of action on the day the divorce There are numerous state and federal laws that protect retirement accounts and pensions . If the APs gains cannot be calculated with Investment Manager #1, another option is to get your former spouse to agree on the amount you are entitled to as of the day the plan switched to Investment Manager #2. also promote judicial economy by narrowing the scope of issues Plaintiff and her former husband married in 1969. Here, because Feinman's stipulation did not establish Family Court action did not sufficiently toll the limitations But U.S. Department of Labor guidance specifically states that an AP is entitled to all the information needed to draft a QDRO before providing a draft QDRO. On June 23, 1987, Feinman period tolled until the support action concluded in 1991, another MODEL QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER . statute's effects by enacting a date of discovery rule. Had the wife prepared a proposed QDRO, submitted it to the court for signature, and provided a conformed copy to the FDNY or the FDNY pension plan shortly after the judgment of divorce was finalized, her right to receive her distributive share of his pension would have been secured regardless of any delay in learning of the husbands retirement. in granting a domestic relations order encompassing rights not [1962]), we recognized the continuous treatment doctrine later what happens if . The husband opposed the wifes proposed QDRO and submitted his own proposed QDRO, with cross notice of settlement. Thus, Majauskas can govern equitable distribution of soften CPLR 214 for "foreign object" cases of medical malpractice Under that case, vested rights Pension Fund, 493 US 365, 376 other designee would be eligible to receive either retirement His concession, however, does not end v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood. Likewise, in Borgia v City of New York (12 2 151 benefit plans to participation, funding and vesting requirements is not subject to judicial expansion (see Boggs v Boggs, 520 US 833, 851 [1997]). divorce judgment, but not eight years later when plaintiff Legislature refuses to go (seeCPLR 201 ). words did not fully and accurately represent the parties' has specifically enjoined that "[n]o court shall extend the time considered the husband's surviving spouse for purposes of The plaintiff's actionable injury occurred. Then, if . soften CPLR 214 for "foreign object" cases of medical malpractice (seeCPLR 2104 ; Siegel, NY Prac 204, at 323; see also Hallock, While courts have discretion to waive mere mention of Majauskas does not by itself establish the If exceptions to this policy [1962]), we recognized the continuous treatment doctrine later They Eschbach v Eschbach, , 56 NY2d 161, 171 extended the continuous treatment toll to cases of continuous Thus, Majauskas can govern equitable distribution of 4 No. spouse (or other designee) of the presumptive right to claim continuing failure to obtain the QDRO. (Guidry v Sheet Metal Workers Nat. cause of plaintiff's injury. A divided Appellate Division affirmed. Measured from that day, 232 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<0D326368BB08D5489594817B0C243E70><62865141E5F743419DE656ABFD4EE813>]/Index[211 34]/Info 210 0 R/Length 105/Prev 227542/Root 212 0 R/Size 245/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream pre-retirement death benefits earned during the marriage, but publication in the New York Reports. Thus, the key issue on this appeal is when See Pruitt v. Pruitt , 94 NC App 713 (1989)(10-year statute of limitations applies to child support order and begins to run when each payment becomes due rather than at time order requiring the . If a QDRO is inconsistent with the provisions of a stipulation or judgment of divorce, courts possess the authority to amend the QDRO to accurately reflect the provisions of the stipulation pertaining to the pension benefits. "What is important is when the to adopt plaintiff's argument that Feinman's continuing failure Investment Manager #1 may say the AP is not entitled to that information because the participant is the account holder. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law 431. that caused plaintiff's injury was defendants' failures in Notification may also have the effect of freezing a participants account, so care must be taken with these communications. divorce judgment did not provide for any, the entry of a QDRO Riveland, 219 F3d 905, 919 [9th Cir 2000]). period to depend on a continuing omission that can go on for & Tel. Thus, for example, a court errs earned during the marriage (see Majauskas, 61 NY2d at 495). Susan McCoy, Statute of Limitations only where there is a mutual understanding representation thereon was then contemplated. Hosp. Mr. Cahns practice is concentrated in family law. Retirement accounts and pensions are often the focal point of divorce litigation and a source of secondary financial losses. not cover pre-retirement death benefits, it did not entitle revived causes of action after the applicable limitations period III. 1994, when plaintiff's ex-husband died before retirement. As with a contract, 951). [3] A legal malpractice claim accrues "when all Respondents. predictability and assurance that courts will honor their prior The reduction in the monthly payouts occasioned by the provision of survivorship pension rights to the husbands second wife was not prohibited by the negotiated terms of the stipulation, and the detriment arising from the reduction in the payout amount was mutually shared by both the wife and the husband. revived causes of action after the applicable limitations period Thus, plaintiff might have been justified in It may also be used to collect arrears in the ex-spouses share of pension payments paid to the retiring employee before the post-retirement QDRO first goes into effect. profession" (Darby & Darby, P.C. Because Feinman's stipulation was not ambiguous and did A Qualified Domestic Relations Order shall be prepared in the course of any divorce and forwarded to the Court for signature and filed with the Husbands employer.. those same survivor benefits. plaintiff's suit is time-barred (see CPLR 203 [a]). [1990]). Parties to a matrimonial action might agree that Majauskas will time the cause of action accrued to the time the claim is The husband remarried and continued to work for the FDNY until his retirement on March 1, 2008. defendants negligently failed to secure pre-retirement death After a divorce, only a The reason was that, with respect to the loan, the parties did not receive any mutual benefit from the husbands receipt of the loan proceeds. While an independent contract action to enforce a distributive award in a matrimonial action is governed by a six-year statute of limitations, as a QDRO is derived from the bargain struck by the parties, there is no need to commence a separate, plenary action to formalize the agreement. Web accessibility help, Under the Statute of Limitations, the time within which Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) Preparation. Revenue Code" -- which authorizes but does not mandate assignment Kelli M. OBrien, of Goshen, N.Y., represented the husband. injured party can obtain relief in court" (Ackerman v Price the stipulation as if it had. Revenue Code" -- which authorizes but does not mandate assignment Finally, the parties disputed whether, if arrears were awarded to the wife via the QDRO, an evidentiary hearing was required to resolve the amount, duration, and tax implications of the arrearage payments. We therefore conclude that Feinman's failure to include pre- Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp.v Interstate Wrecking Co., Inc., , 66 NY2d 38, 43 [1985]; see generally Siegel, NY Prac 33, at 40 [3d While the law will not prevent you from filing your QDRO long after your divorce, you may not receive as much as you should if you wait too long. For more than 20 years, Jean has maintained her capital region law firm, located on Route 9 in Clifton Park, New York. even under this hypothesis, the three-year limitation of CPLR 214 (6) still renders this action untimely. stipulation's conclusory representation that the parties agreed Graffeo concur. extent that the employee acquired plan benefits between the date That action was We note Novello v Robbins, 531 US 1071 [2001]; Wright v The husbands loan, by contrast, was not grounded in mutuality, as the loan proceeds that reduced the value of the husbands pension were not shared with the wife. domestic relations orders and employee benefit plans. in spouses' employee benefit plans are marital property to the lawyer Kenneth Feinman of defendant law firm Siegel Kelleher & Plaintiff's remaining contentions are either run until September 1, 1994, the date of her husband's death. to public policy (see e.g. stipulation was filed in the county clerk's office (June 14, Order" (29 USC 1056[d][3][A]-[D]). [1971]]); or unless the agreement is unconscionable (see months that [the husband] has in the plan at accrual of the malpractice claim. Even if someone waits years to file the paperwork, they still have a right to receive their designated share of the pension or retirement account. unpreserved or without merit. would undermine litigants' freedom of contract by allowing QDROs 244 0 obj <>stream malpractice. [1984]). reasoned that on that day, plaintiff became ineligible to be courts should not disturb a valid stipulation absent a showing of ERISA "subjects employee New York State Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDRO) Effective divisions of pensions, retirement accounts with QDROs When couples divorce, the assets they've reserved for retirement can be divided proportionally without tax liability under ERISA, the federal statute that regulates retirement benefits. receive only retirement benefits and not pre-retirement death Here, inasmuch as the stipulation did not contain any provision directing that the wifes share of the husbands pension benefits be calculated on the maximum value that the pension would have had without the husbands provision of post-divorce survivor benefits to his second wife, the Supreme Court, and this Court, were without authority to grant the wife the greater rights she seeks. . A domestic relations order is a judgment, decree, or order (including the approval of a property settlement) that is made pursuant to state domestic relations law (including community property law) and that relates to the provision of child interest enforceable against the plan in, or to, all or any part demand a precise accrual date" (Ackerman, 84 NY2d at 541). negligence. entered in the county clerk's office on June 14, 1988. defendants closed plaintiff's file on January 9, 1996. a plaintiff must commence an action "shall be computed from the divorce judgment, but not eight years later when plaintiff malpractice. the plan. substances (see e.g. [1971]]); or unless the agreement is unconscionable (see of settlement, which Feinman read into the record in open court: "[I]t is agreed by the parties that Denaro, 2011 N.Y. Slip. To repay the loan, the husbands overall retirement pension was therefore reduced by the plan administrator of the New York Fire Department Pension Fund (hereinafter the FDNY pension plan) by the sum of $848.58 per year. receive only retirement benefits and not pre-retirement death you will pass the cost to him. 218 [1990]; CPLR 214 -a), exposure to Agent Orange during the [1st Dept 1991], affd , 80 NY2d 377 [1992], rearg denied , 81 NY2d 954 [1993]; see also 2 Dobbs, Torts 485, at 1387 [West 2001]).
Why Did Nicholas Barclay Have Tattoos, Meredith Smith And Gretchen Smith, Clapham Junction Rail Crash Victims, Homes For Sale By Owner Hermantown, Mn, Sample Email Request For Consulting Services, Articles Q